imnotb at gmail.com
Thu Dec 21 18:37:57 UTC 2006
On 12/21/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/21/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/21/06, Vincent <imnotb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > They look very cool, just too bad the logo is plain again, I liked
> > > > glossy one...
> > > >
> > >
> > > The logo was kept simple intentionally to contrast with the text part;
> > > the opposite how it was with edgy; there the logo image was glossified
> > > the text part was simplified.
> > Why does it have to contrast with the text? Is there some usability
> > reasoning behind that or do you just like it?
> Normally, there must be a hierarchy behind the various compositional
> elements. If visually everything is on the same level, it becomes
> confusing. This is just a basic compositional principle.
Ah, right. But can't the logo and name be looked at as one?
> 2007 Calendar, Great Xmas gift
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel