Deferred Edgy Ideas for Feisty
maxamillion at gmail.com
Sun Dec 3 20:13:53 UTC 2006
That's actually a really good point and I think we should take that
into consideration. One of the problems I have noticed is users complaining
about xubuntu becoming more bloated or slower and I am under the impression
that it's not our fault but more so a side affect of ubuntu-base getting
more and more added to it, so i think keeping with "light" games for the
xubuntu defaults would be a really wise decision.
On 12/3/06, Eero Tamminen <oak at helsinkinet.fi> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 16:46, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > > What about some non-de attached games like Battle for Wesnoth or
> > > something? <g>
> > no chance of getting those in main :) I think they're better suited on a
> > game centric derivative I'd say.
> What about some small SDL (or plain X11) games?
> They take less memory and are faster than the Gnome variants,
> many of them work just fine on P166 with 96MB RAM.
> - Eero
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
--OpenPGP key: 5DBFA065--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel