some ideas about edgy

[Vincent]

I guess this page is already deprecated, but anyway:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/ProposedPackages
You can see before they chose Xfburn they wanted to do Graveman. If you now
bring it up as a discussion again it might be reconsidered.

On 8/2/06, loomis <loomis at neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> I am not sure if this holds true for Xubuntu, but Gnomebaker wouldn't
> even start up on my Ubuntu machine running Gnome because Gnomebaker
> conflicts with certain accessability settings apparently. Ironic that
> Gnomebaker doesn't even run on Gnome. I guess there's a reason why
> everyone still runs K3b, even if they have to install all of the KDE
> libraries.
>
> What about Graveman? Bonfire?
>
> Vincent wrote:
> > Gnomebaker has quite some Gnome dependencies.
> >
> > On 8/2/06, dolby <dubbysounds at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> i was thinking more about replacing xfburn with gnomebaker on next
> >> releases
> >> actually. i dont see a point in keeping xfburn since it cant perform 2
> >> major
> >> tasks.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/some-ideas-about-edgy-tf2029813.html#a5620377
> >> Sent from the xubuntu-devel forum at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> >> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
>



-- 
Vincent

http://getfirefox.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20060802/03e6b475/attachment.html>