cgroup stanza a proposal
Stéphane Graber
stgraber at ubuntu.com
Thu Nov 21 19:25:44 UTC 2013
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:15:47PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgraber at ubuntu.com):
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:23:59PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > > This morning at vUDS we discussed adding support for cgroups in Upstart.
> > >
> > > Before I go into details about the proposed stanza and overall
> > > behaviour, I'd begin by saying that contrary to some other init systems,
> > > our intent is solely related to resource controls which is the main goal
> > > of cgroups. Process grouping and tracking will remain unaffected by the
> > > addition of cgroup support.
> > >
> > > Cgroup support will be implemented by adding a new "cgroup" stanza which
> > > will control the application of cgroup based restrictions to the job.
> > > The limits will be applied to any of the scripts
> > > (pre-start/post-start/job/pre-stop/post-stob) similar to what's done
> > > with setuid/setgid/apparmor stanzas.
> > >
> > > Now my recommended format for the stanza, which I believe should be
> > > flexible enough is:
> > > cgroup <controller> <cgroup name|auto> [<key> <value>]
> > >
> > >
> > > Detail on the fields:
> > > == controller ==
> > > Name for one of the cgroup controller
> > >
> > > Currently the valid values are (but won't be hardcoded into upstart):
> > > - blkio
> > > - cpu
> > > - cpuacct
> > > - cpuset
> > > - devices
> > > - freezer
> > > - hugetlb
> > > - memory
> > > - perf_event
> > >
> > > == cgroup-name|$auto ==
> > > Name of the cgroup to use (and create if non-existing)
> > >
> > > The name may contain a / (e.g. "db/pgsql" or "db/$auto") indicating that
> > > it's requesting a sub-cgroup.
> > >
> > > "$auto" is the recommended name and will have upstart generate a name
> > > based on the job instance name.
> > >
> > > The main use of that field is for cases where a set of jobs should share
> > > limits, in such case the main job should declare the various values and
> > > the others just refer to the cgroup by name but not defined values.
> > >
> > > The name may be different for the various controllers but may not differ
> > > within the same controller. Example:
> > > valid => cgroup memory group1 limit_in_bytes 52428800
> > > cgroup cpuset group2 cpus 0-1
> > >
> > > invalid => cgroup memory group1 limit_in_bytes 52428800
> > > cgroup memory group1 soft_limit_in_bytes 1024
> >
> > The invalid entry above is actually valid... What I meant was:
> >
> > invalid => cgroup memory group1 limit_in_bytes 52428800
> > cgroup memory group2 soft_limit_in_bytes 1024
> >
> > Thanks to Serge Hallyn for noticing!
> >
> > >
> > > == key ==
> > > The cgroup control file minus the controller name, so for example
> > > memory.soft_limit_in_bytes will become limit_in_bytes.
>
> One thing Tejun (kernel cgroups maintainer) has been big on is that
> userspace should not sit too closely to the implementation, meaning
> not be relying on the precise cgroup filenames. Systemd addresses
> this by completely abstracting things into 'slices'. lmctfy introduces
> more generic names, i.e. 'memory {limit: 100000}' instead of
> memory.limit = 100000.
>
> It may be too early to decide this - but should the key/value pairs
> be in lmctfy format vs. the current lxc way, which is verbatim
> filenames and values?
So I don't think we want upstart to link against lmctfy as we try to
keep the number of libraries we link against to a bare minimum (for
obvious reason since we're PID 1 and have to support things like
stateful re-exec).
I don't think we want to add a lot of cgroup internals logic to upstart
either, so unless that kind of abstraction is directly exposed by the
cgroup manager, I think we'll have to stick to exposing a rather raw
view of the underlying cgroups.
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20131121/83f75c8f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the upstart-devel
mailing list