Upstart 1.0 Design discussion

Casey Dahlin cdahlin at redhat.com
Mon Sep 14 14:58:13 BST 2009


On 09/14/2009 09:28 AM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 19:03 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> 
>> On 09/12/2009 12:31 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>>> Another interesting thing abouts events is that they too have a
>>> lifecycle and different states.
>>>
>>> They're not just fired and forgotten: the event is kept "open" all the
>>> time that jobs that it changed are in transition between levels.  Only
>>> once the jobs are all back at a rest level again is the event finished.
>>>
>>
>> My earlier email on Triggers proposes doing away with this internally. 
>> Events are now fire-and-forget.
>>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, do you mean that you're removing the
> blocking behaviour of events entirely?
> 



More information about the upstart-devel mailing list