Upstart 0.5.0. Assertion causing kernel panic with respawn stanza

Scott James Remnant scott at
Sat May 23 16:58:26 BST 2009

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:11 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote:

> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Scott James Remnant <scott at> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 22:20 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote:
> >> > Hardly "did not get any feed-back"
> >> and True again. Call it a compatibility problem the report was /is an
> >> official way of stating that problem. and there is no response.
> >>
> > What kind of a response are you expecting?
> Thanks for the report. "This is a known issue" or "we where not aware
> of this issue". The problem
> is caused by the event driven nature of the system. "To resolve this
> issue we need to create a in memory
> structure that describes the dependencies" or "We don't know yet how
> to fix this issue".
You had exactly this response.  Frankly, I don't know what you're
complaining about!

> My goal is not to bash and I am willing to put some effort (as I did)
> in fixing such issue but I need at least
> some guidance into how you want it fixed.
How I want it fixed?  You're the one who wants it fixed ;)

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 

More information about the upstart-devel mailing list