Upstart 0.5.0. Assertion causing kernel panic with respawn stanza

[Scott James Remnant]

On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 22:20 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote:

> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Scott James Remnant <scott at netsplit.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 15:47 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote:
> >
> >> I created bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/337665 for this
> >> but we did not get any feed-back on that so I don't know what to say
> >> about this.....
> >>
> > Err, I discussed this extensively on IRC with you.
> True
> 
> >
> > Upstart is behaving _as_designed_ here, and I agreed with you that
> > Upstart's design was therefore clearly broken.  But we didn't get as far
> > as deciding how this should behave.
> True.
> 
> >
> > Hardly "did not get any feed-back"
> and True again. Call it a compatibility problem the report was /is an
> official way of stating that problem. and there is no response.
> 
What kind of a response are you expecting?

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20090523/4c11f954/attachment.pgp