[ANNOUNCE] upstart 0.5.2 released
Scott James Remnant
scott at netsplit.com
Thu Jun 18 11:33:12 BST 2009
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 10:06 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > If you had standalone tools/command or utility programs that don't talk
> > to each other, I suspect it would have been ok.
> >
> > Upstart is one of those applications that everyone in the system needs
> > to communicate via D-Bus messaging where the Message API is defined by a
> > GPLv3 application in this case Upstart.
> >
> The Upstart D-Bus interface is very much intended to be a public
> interface that any software may use without licence contamination. The
> D-Bus protocol is an official freedesktop.org standard, and the Upstart
> interface is published and documented over that protocol according to
> the standard.
>
> This is a long way from "intimate" (the old IPC interface 0.3 uses could
> be described as intimate, and one of the reasons it was dropped was to
> avoid this issue).
>
> If this needs specific addressing, I could add a comment to the
> dbus/*.xml (which define the interfaces) explicitly stating that
> software may freely use these interfaces.
>
Since it seems to make sense to do so anyway, I have made this change
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~scott/upstart/trunk/revision/1120
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~scott/upstart/0.5/revision/1083
It also makes sense to me that people should be able to copy these files
into their tree to generate bindings based from them, so I've placed
them under a permissive licence.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20090618/373ca7c7/attachment.pgp
More information about the upstart-devel
mailing list