[ANNOUNCE] upstart 0.5.2 released

[Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)]

Like I said, there is no point hashing the V3 Vs V2 debate here. 

Its been done quite extensively in the larger community. What I do know
is that industry in general is not too happy with v3. Just try moving
the kernel to V3 and see how many fewer companies touch it.  
Again, v3 for non critical optional components may not be that much of
an issue. But upstart is a very critical piece of how the linux system
comes up, right next to the kernel.

So the question then for us at upstart is as, how much of adoption do we
want for Upstart.    I personally would like this model to be the
default model everywhere linux is used, soon. 

With V3 I don't see that happenning.

Sarvi

-----Original Message-----
From: Casey Dahlin [mailto:cdahlin at redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:16 PM
To: Kees Jongenburger
Cc: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi); Upstart Development; Scott James
Remnant
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] upstart 0.5.2 released
Importance: High

On 06/17/2009 02:55 PM, Kees Jongenburger wrote:

> I had some feeling the last weeks that things where starting to move 
> in the right direction again but really not only do I need to give the

> copyright to the project I also lose the right to use the software as 
> I like and who knows that the license will be next and what code will 
> be used for.
> 

..What exactly do you think GPLv3 entails?

--CJD