reacting to respawn giving up?

[Janne Karhunen]

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Scott James Remnant <scott at netsplit.com> wrote:

>> > Things like PAM sessions, users being able to start/stop their own jobs,
>> > etc. all come into play.
>>
>> Hmm, some sort of basic draft attached. Any pointers where
>> this goes wrong?
>>
> Yes, it doesn't address the difference between a setuid process and
> running a process "as a user" (which suggests a full PAM session).

Fair enough. Would you be fine with it if we separate
that as two stanzas - setuid and the user one with full
PAM support?


-- 
// Janne