upstart 0.5, user-land tools and roadmap
Garrett Cooper
yanegomi at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 07:12:59 GMT 2008
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:45 PM, shirish <shirishag75 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to add so I don't confuse anybody.
>
> From what I understand. the goal of upstart has nothing to do with
> boot time improvements, its a side-benefit one gets if services are
> automated to start or stop while booting up
> --
> Regards,
> Shirish Agarwal
> This email is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
>
> 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
SysV init has been doing this type of thing for ages -- just in a more
dumbed down form with runlevels.
Upstart brings a number of improvements to the table, but AFAIK there
hasn't been a push (nor should there be IMO) for upstart to do more
than handle initial process(es) and job(s). I really don't see the
added benefit in making Upstart into a system swiss army knife of
sorts, because that just makes Upstart into a userlevel mini-kernel
;).
-Garrett
More information about the upstart-devel
mailing list