upstart configuration

[Harald Hoyer]

metzench at ccux-linux.de wrote:
> Hi,
> well, why using chkconfig if integrating the mechanism into initctl would
> be the cleaner way? chkconfig doesn' t really work clean everytime and
> using the necessary headers for it in upstarts service files brings us one
> step back to the sysvinit behaviour.
> 
> For me i think, using a clean new way all integrated sounds the best.
> 
> What do the others mean?
> 
>> just add "chkconfig" functionality to upstart, no matter what underlying
>> mechanism.
> 
> 
> 

yes, initctl.. and not for the old sysv, but the job files