Clarification on upstart-0.5 and dbus usage

[Scott James Remnant]

On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:04 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:

> But that said, D-Bus is a fine choice for now. I hope though, the
> Upstart community is open to code contributions from us that allow for
> modular alternatives to D-Bus. Ofcourse without compromising on
> performance or clean code.
> 
Would the effort not be better spend fixing whatever problem(s) you have
with D-Bus?

It really has become the standard communication mechanism for Linux, and
would greatly benefit from an embedded eye.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20080619/a5b461af/attachment.pgp