IRC meeting

Rob Ubuntu Linux rob.ubuntu.linux at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 30 03:29:45 GMT 2007


On Nov 30, 2007 2:13 AM, Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno at gmail.com> wrote:
> El Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:16:57 +0000
>
> "Rob Ubuntu Linux" <rob.ubuntu.linux at googlemail.com> escribió:
>
> > On Nov 29, 2007 5:16 AM, Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > El Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:17:22 +0000
> > > "Rob Ubuntu Linux" <rob.ubuntu.linux at googlemail.com> escribió:

> I'm not talking about persuading anyone to use another protocol, just
> to make dbus optional. Nothing really _needs_ to talk to init, its
> useful, but it should be optional, you can make a simple event-gateway
> between d-bus and the "init-bus".

It is optional.

Sys V init doesn't use IPC.  Sys V init, was static, generally
everything configured was started on boot, all hardware present, and
the control was by the admin doing start/stop/restart/reload/status,
plus changing the run-level.  You could view the signals, passing wait
statuses as limitted events.

Upstart, is trying to handle the dynamic hotplugging, and applet type
control stuff nicely; by being event driven.  The event messages by
whole slew of programs are on D-Bus.  But there's the "emit ... start"
type possibility to.

Why have the "init-bus" protocol, what is going to talk it?



More information about the upstart-devel mailing list