IRC meeting
Rob Ubuntu Linux
rob.ubuntu.linux at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 27 00:39:16 GMT 2007
On 11/26/07, Scott James Remnant <scott at netsplit.com> wrote:
> Runlevel support ... Runlevels are ancient history, forget about them.
> That being said, Upstart's sysv compat tools emulate them so you can't
> tell the difference.
They're useful to admins though, during system maintenance. Some
shorthand to move to "service level" with non-graphical login,
non-network services is useful. Rebooting and remounting file systems
can take a long time, and when you're doing remote admin, single user
mode is too blunt a sword.
Yes, Debian says you if you have software installed it's because you
want to run it, but actually sometimes you don't and turning a load of
daemons off one by one by hand is error prone.
So if Upstart is genuinely trying to be better than SyS V init, I
think way of naming a level of service and their dependencies is
worthwhile. Debian & Ubuntu may not have defined run levels, but not
replacing them with something better is giving reasons to sys admins
to keep sys V init.
More information about the upstart-devel
mailing list