Scott James Remnant
scott at netsplit.com
Mon Nov 26 09:01:54 GMT 2007
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:24 -0200, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> El Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:08:31 -0200
> Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno at gmail.com> escribió:
> > Hi initng and upstart developers.
> > I've been watching the development of upstart since about the start,
> > and I must thank you Scott, because upstart is very original in the
> > way of starting the system.
> > Sadly, all init implementations share a lot of ugly design ideas...
> > I want to organize a IRC meeting at for initng and upstart developers,
> > if possible. I always had a vision about how init should be, but
> > nothing is near that ideal right now, maybe we can trace a new path on
> > the development of init systems...
> Look at the following document:
Many of your assertions here are wrong; and in some cases I would
disagree with your ratings as well (e.g. I would say that a monolithic
init is good, and plug-in based is bad).
> I think 2007-12-08 12:00 UTC is sufficiently neutral, what do you
> think guys?.
That's a Saturday, so I would not be able to make it.
Monday to Friday is better for me.
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20071126/dfc9bee3/attachment.pgp
More information about the upstart-devel