glibc 2.3 / Debian

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 19:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:

> @Keybuk: It would be great if you'd consider to add these patches,
> this would make it easier to maintain the package for Debian.
> 
Yeah, I think I agree ;)  Though I want to avoid too much backwards
compatibility, I think that being at least compatible with the main
distributions development release is a general "win".

Applied to libnih (and the same configure line to upstart).

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20060918/9bc4afc9/attachment.pgp