A few more questions about Upstart

[Scott James Remnant]

On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 20:00 +0000, Alex Smith wrote:

> Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:17 +0000, Alex Smith wrote:
> > 
> >> Just another question - it says on the Getting Started page this: "Note 
> >> that the job file format is not stable yet, so if you upgrade upstart 
> >> later, you may need to fix existing files." What is likely to change in 
> >> the future - I mean, would there be any changes that will break existing 
> >> jobs?
> >>
> > Everything in the current job format is likely to be changed.

> Hmm, but will there be a point when it's classed as 'stable'? I mean, a 
> point after which there won't be any changes which break existing jobs. 
> This is quite important IMO, as we (the Frugalware developers) would not 
> want to have to change every package with a job on an upstart upgrade.
> 
Oh, certainly, yes.

The 0.3 branch should yield a relatively stable format. 

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20061106/8ac1c52e/attachment.pgp