[Bug 426614] [NEW] oprofile is linked against non-shipping version of libbfd

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Wed Sep 9 03:23:27 UTC 2009


Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: oprofile

Oprofile, at least current version in karmic for arm, is linked against
a version of libbfd that is not included in the libbfd package.

root at karmic:/usr/bin# ldd /usr/bin/opreport
        libpopt.so.0 => /lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x40035000)
        libbfd-2.19.51.20090723.so => not found
        libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40046000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/vfp/libdl.so.2 (0x40064000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x4006f000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/vfp/libm.so.6 (0x40163000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x401dc000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/vfp/libc.so.6 (0x401f0000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.3 (0x40000000)
root at karmic:/usr/bin# ls -l /usr/lib/libbfd*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 614724 2009-08-28 09:46 /usr/lib/libbfd-2.19.51.20090827.so


oprofile package info as currently installed:

root at karmic:/usr/bin# dpkg -s oprofile
Package: oprofile
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 5148
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
Architecture: armel
Version: 0.9.4+cvs20090629-2ubuntu1
Replaces: oprofile-common
Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0, binutils, libc6 (>= 2.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.4.0), libpopt0 (>= 1.14), libs)
Suggests: oprofile-gui
Conflicts: oprofile-modules0.2, oprofile-modules0.3, oprofile-modules0.4, oprofile-modules0.5, oprofile-8
Description: system-wide profiler for Linux systems
[... rest of description removed]

dpkg -s for binutils on my current system:

root at gumstix:~/o# dpkg -s binutils
Package: binutils
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 8832
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>
Architecture: armel
Version: 2.19.51.20090827-1ubuntu1
Provides: elf-binutils
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.8), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.4.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
Suggests: binutils-doc (>= 2.19.51.20090827-1ubuntu1)
Conflicts: elf-binutils, gas, modutils (<< 2.4.19-1)
Description: The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
[...]


Looks like all is needed is a rebuild of oprofile (I verified this locally), but why was it linked against a date-versioned libbfd in the first place, instead of the base library (link)?

** Affects: oprofile (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
oprofile is linked against non-shipping version of libbfd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426614
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs




More information about the universe-bugs mailing list