[Bug 398637] Re: [MIR] ibus and data packages

[LI Daobing]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 20:01, Loïc Minier<lool at dooz.org> wrote:
> The packaging of ibus-anthy is really substandard; I'm willing to help
> improve it, but couldn't locate the definitive base on which to start
> this work: karmic has a source which points at lp:~lidaobing/+junk/ibus-
> anthy but this branch doesn't contain the karmic version nor the jaunty
> one (but does contain another jaunty version).

it contains the debian version[1].
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ibus-anthy.html
>
> Things I've noticed:
> - removal of patch system with removal of last patch (increases delta with Debian needlessly in this case too, even if it's the same maintainer)

which patch is needed?


> - useless CROSS vars / logic in rules (uses dh_autoconfigure); also useless tests for presence of config.guess/.sub from autotools-dev
> - references unknown clean0 target in rules' .PHONY
> - lintian override to hide an actual error (ibus-anthy: binary-without-manpage)
> - no Python-Version/pyversions but calls dh_pysupport; package isn't named python-foo, didn't check actual contents
> - doesn't call intltool-update on build
please provide a patch, thanks.


> - no watch file
there is a watch file[2].
[2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lidaobing/%2Bjunk/ibus-anthy/annotate/head%3A/debian/watch

-- 
Best Regards
LI Daobing

-- 
[MIR] ibus and data packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs