[Bug 328606] Re: Liferea shouldn't include actions if notification server doesn't accept them

[hyperair]

On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:37 +0000, Ted Gould wrote:
> Checking capabilities requires a round trip on DBus.  Which could be
> delayed by the notification daemon being busy.  It definitely will be if
> everyone check capabilities all the time.  For the number of times that
> people change notification daemons, I think it's better to check once.
> 
> The correct way to implement it would be to attach the name owner and
> then handle the case where the name owner is destroyed as it drops off
> the bus.  But, those patches would get rather large.  Again, I think
> this is a pretty minor usecase.
> 
By "busy" you mean that it has hung, don't you? I highly doubt you could
spam notify-osd (or any other notification daemon) enough to make it
hang.
-- 
Chow Loong Jin

-- 
Liferea shouldn't include actions if notification server doesn't accept them
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328606
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs