[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)

[Alexander Sack]

** Description changed:

- To provide proper integration with ubufox, plugins should also put a
- link for their binary in
+ To provide proper integration with ubufox,
+ 
+ 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link
+ for their binary in
  
   /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
  
  and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.
  
- Also please add the Description and Filename header to your binary
- package, like gnash:
+ 2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to
+ the binary package control, like gnash:
  
  Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
  Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
  
  --------
  
  When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
  it gives two options:
  1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
  2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
  
  the second options supposedly uses openjdk.
  
  No descriptions are given whatsoever.

** Attachment added: "totem fix"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22499081/totem.debdiff

** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs at lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs