[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

[stevel]

@Fabien: We've got some patches awaiting review in BMO for upstreaming,
but most of our patches to XULRunner aren't going to get upstreamed
anytime soon without some cleanup, effort, and shepherding.  I don't
foresee us being able to use a clean Mozilla-supplied XULRunner anytime
in the immediate future.

What's Ubuntu's policy on the SLA?  Currently our SLA covers a few things:
* The licenses (tri-license) that Songbird is under
* The proprietary licenses that the closed-source add-ons (downloaded during first-run) are covered under
* Indemnity & Liability
* The bundled third party-developed open source packages (e.g. taglib, etc.) and their licenses

Probably some of these aren't necessary applicable to Ubuntu (such as
the bundled third-party developed open source licenses and the
proprietary licenses if Ubuntu desires to not have those prompted for
download)...

I suppose we could try and do something for Ubuntu like what you guys
did with Mozilla in moving the SLA to the browser notification hat.
We'd have to hammer this out sometime after our 1.0 release next month.

-- 
[needs-packaging] Songbird
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a direct subscriber.