[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit

[Justin M. Wray]

Kristian Hermansen, thanks again for marking the other bug as a
duplicate.  I missed this one when I added.

I too have a packaged version, from the unmodified metasploit release,
it is more then possible to build the deb with the SVN, as SVN is used
to update the exploits, and other framework modules.  May not be the
ideal build, but can work.

Either way, if you want to modify the "original package" we can simply
write a patch, and place it in the debian/ directory.  But again,
doesn't seem modifications are necessary, everything builds fine.  And
that is when we start to interfere with the license.

The real issue here isn't the "ease" of packaging metasploit, but the
license itself.

So do we have the license issue resolved?  In what other ways can I
assist?   Alessandro Tanasi we should trade .changes to see where we can
improve the package, before upload to REVU.

I am really looking forward to getting metasploit in the Ubuntu
repositories.

Thanks,
Justin M. Wray

-- 
[needs-packaging] metasploit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a bug assignee.