[Bug 3073] hula issues with the mail-transport-agent virtual package
N6REJ
cogyfarm at grm.net
Mon Oct 24 04:15:04 UTC 2005
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3073
Comment:
Trent Lloyd wrote:
>Public bug report changed:
>https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3073
>
>Comment:
>This bug has absolutely nothing to do with hula (despite the title) -
>it's a generic 'issue' - simple fact is any server system should have a
>MTA.
>
>If you want to remove hula but put postfix back you can do so like this
>
># apt-get install postfix hula-
>
>and then, if you want to purge hula (delete its configuration files)
># dpkg --purge hula
>
>And whether HULA is mature or not is not a place for bug reports, please
>take such comments elsewhere, some people are using it succesfully so
>its available for people to use or try if they wish.
>
>
>
you know remarks like this make me NOT want to post the many bugs I've
found in ubuntu! The original statement was that hula has no business
removing mysql-server without asking first. It doing so makes a HUGE
assumption that no other program has use for the sql server or its
databases. Reinstalling a server that has perhaps already been
configured by many other programs ( this would occur if hula was the
last to be installed ) and consqequently having to rebuild all those
configs, would REALLY PISS ME OFF! This has nothing to do with wether
or not a server needs an MTA. That is a seperate debateable issue, that
is not for here. I don't disagree, but its a mute point. As to where
the recommendation came from, ubuntu's very spotty documentation lists
HULA as the recommended mail server without even so much as a mention of
postfix.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserDocumentation?action=show&redirect=NewToUbuntu
Troy
More information about the universe-bugs
mailing list