[ubuntu-x] [Fwd: Mesa 7.6 go/no go criteria]

[Bryce Harrington]

Here's the proposed criteria.  I think Rick's on this list; feel free to
post feedback here, and at least one of us will make sure it gets
accounted for.

----- Forwarded message from Rick Spencer <rick.spencer at canonical.com> -----

Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:56 -0700
From: Rick Spencer <rick.spencer at canonical.com>
To: Martin Pitt <martin.pitt at ubuntu.com>,
	Alexander Sack <asac at canonical.com>,
	Alberto Milone <alberto.milone at canonical.com>,
	Sebastien Bacher <seb128 at canonical.com>,
	Bryce Harrington <bryce at canonical.com>,
	Marjo Mercado <marjo.mercado at canonical.com>,
	Araceli Pulido <ara.pulido at canonical.com>,
	steve.langasek at canonical.com
Subject: Mesa 7.6 go/no go criteria


> 6. rickspencer3 and all: define measure for triggering roll back
We should roll back if we encounter:

1. We get new crashers with dupes on any hardware that we can't diagnose
2. We get crashers that can only be fixed by updating other components
(i.e. -intel)
3. We get crashers that require any kind of kernel patches, etc...
4. Similar to 1-3, but for freezes and performance regressions as well

I suppose the "we get" piece could use some tightening up. Thoughts?

Cheers, Rick

----- End forwarded message -----