<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13-10-11 01:47 AM, Jared Norris wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CAF4+eiUCw6ZZ3jmXKK9YLm5k=uHqk7eMoHGepo6DhtpLLB8LaA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">From your signature it appears you're using a version of Ubuntu that is nearly 18 months old so I'm not sure what the issue is with having applications that are of about that age. </blockquote> Thanks for all the info everyone. I now understand why my LO is not being upgraded to the latest version. The release dates are… <blockquote>LO 3.5 12/02 U 12.04 12/04 LO 3.6 12/08 U 12.10 12/10 </blockquote> So, as a former Quality Assurance Engineer, I don't understand why Canonical is patching LO 3.5 rather than upgrading to LO 3.6. It was, after all, released before U 12.10. As for the reason I'm still on 12.04. Canonical decided to drop support for Unity 2D and Gnome for Gnome Classic. As far as I've been able to determine neither thought of providing a list of 3D graphics cards and a procedure to upgrade the hardware for those of us who had 2D graphics cards in our computers. Ergo, I've stayed on 12.04. If anyone knows where I can get this info, I appreciate it. Also, if anyone knows of a way of getting a list of all the packages added to customize Ubuntu to the needs of the user that can be used to install the same packages on a new machine, that too would be helpful. P.S. Both Firefox and Thunderbird are included in Ubuntu releases and yet they are, ultimately, upgraded to the most recent versions. <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Udvarias Ur This letter was generated and sent from Thunderbird 24.0 on Ubuntu Linux 12.04.2 LTS. Cette lettre a été générée et envoyée à partir de Thunderbird 24.0 sur Ubuntu Linux 12.04.2 LTS. </pre> </body> </html>