<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
The problem for me is that I use the computer for real work. I know
others do, but it's not even a little bit of a hobby for me. Gnome 2
had been an incredibly nice productivity tool. To me, Unity is big
and dumb. It seems the world has fallen in love with tablet
interfaces. I don't want a bunch of eye-candy on my desktop. Is
there any chance that someone will fork gnome to serve the original
geeks who grew up using linux?<br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/17/2011 09:51 PM, R S V Reddy wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJ_M-H_1KrX76q6xVnXbHrC==nNnrVtZKeJ4VgvHwFs=9bcs3g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Liam
Proven <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:lproven@gmail.com" target="_blank">lproven@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
> But finally I would say that we are home users,<br>
> we no more '<font size="4">no</font>' much of the
technology under the tree but take only the shadow<br>
> which we need. So if our tree changes, we feel some
pain.<br>
<br>
</div>
I'm afraid I don't understand this at all. Is it a translated
saying<br>
or aphorism?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
By mistake, I just wrote 'no', it is in fact 'know'!<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
I have noticed that the change from GNOME 2 to Unity does seem
to have<br>
caused many people much pain, yes. Personally I find this hard
to<br>
understand, but then, Unity is much like Mac OS X and I know
Macs very<br>
well, having been a Mac user (as well as a PC and Unix one)
since the<br>
late 1980s. It is hard for me to understand how so many people
can be<br>
so inflexible that a simple rearrangement of their desktop
makes them<br>
hate the new system.<br>
<br>
I think that the best thing that could come out of it is lots
of new<br>
users for Xubuntu and Xfce, which is not as sophisticated as
GNOME but<br>
can be made to look and work very much like it.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
(A few versions ago, the Xubuntu desktop looked almost exactly
like<br>
GNOME, with the same panels in the same places. Sadly, it no
longer<br>
does, so migrants from GNOME have some work to do as soon as
they<br>
start using it, rearranging it to the way that they want.)<br>
<br>
Some will go to GNOME 3 running in Fallback Mode, but I think
that<br>
will disappear in a release or two, maybe in GNOME 3.4 next
April. I<br>
have read a news story about increasing 2D support in GNOME
Shell, but<br>
I can't find it now. Once GNOME Shell can run without 3D
acceleration<br>
(as Unity-2D does) then I think Fallback Mode will disappear.<br>
<br>
So unless the Unity-to-GNOME-3 migrants decide they like GNOME
Shell -<br>
unlikely, if they hate Unity that much - then even they might
well end<br>
up on Xfce, I suspect.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
Yeah I agree, but since the Gnome users are using it since
when they are using Ubuntu (true, for at least me), so they
have fallen in love with it (at least me). On the contrary,
this declaration never implies that Unity is bad or not good.
As I commented (regarding Unity problems, earlier in some
post, I guess..), since I heard some people crying for
that...., that's all! But if in case, if there were an option
to choose either from Unity or Gnome, I bet I would have gone
with Gnome. Though this has little impact (little impact even
on home users, house wives, kids, etc..etc..), but as said
earlier, the thing was that Long Term Support should be
intact, other versions (like 11.04) is good to play with or
'ready for sudden changes'; however, at the same time, I agree
that it is just 'long term support' and this 'long term' has
inevitably an end, like any other thing.<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
-- <br>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Two atoms are walking along.
Suddenly, one stops. The other says, "What's</span><br
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">wrong?" "I've lost an
electron." "Are you sure?" "I'm positive!"</span><span
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>