<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Avi Greenbury <<a href="mailto:lists@avi.co">lists@avi.co</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> In short, then, if you want a '64 bit' version of Ubuntu, you want the amd64 one, even if your processor is made by Intel. </blockquote></div> However, I have started using the download of 64 bit version, but I am using 2 GB RAM only and it is a single home PC, should I really go and use that (64 bit) only? However, there is no advantage(s) (I don't know) of using that, but also no disadvantage(s) (if there are, please let me know). But at least I am using the thing for which my processor is made for. I came to know (recently) that my processor is supporting 64 bit. My processor is this one: <a href="http://ark.intel.com/products/37212/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5200-(2M-Cache-2_50-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)">http://ark.intel.com/products/37212/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5200-(2M-Cache-2_50-GHz-800-MHz-FSB)</a> -- Two atoms are walking along. Suddenly, one stops. The other says, "What's wrong?" "I've lost an electron." "Are you sure?" "I'm positive!" =================================================== <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/whyilikeubuntu/" target="_blank">Ubuntu LTS is good</a>! ===================================================