<div> Wow, this SATA RAID I fought so hard to install takes about 12 seconds. john </div> <div> </div> <div> </div> -----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Larsen <klarsen1@gmail.com> Sent: Sat, Oct 31, 2009 12:35 am Subject: Re: Slower performance with ext4 <div id="AOLMsgPart_0_a6d41ac4-a1c5-4909-b351-973ae3eb0859" style="margin: 0px; font-family: Tahoma,Verdana,Arial,Sans-Serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> <pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>Amedee Van Gasse (ub) wrote: > On Fri, October 30, 2009 07:08, Raphael wrote: >> >> Help, after I had clean installed Karmic on my ext4 partition, the >> performance was significantly slower compared to ext3. Startup was around >> 7 secs but with ext4 it's now 20 secs application speeds are also slower. > > What are you comparing? > * Karmic Koala clean install on ext3 > with > * Karmic Koala clean install on ext4 > > Could you please do a clean install with ext3 + install bootchart, to get > an exact timing, and then do the same with a clean ext4 install? Thank > you. > > This is important. My old computer takes 45 seconds to go from clicking Grub start to full on. I expect the speed of the CPU is critical to a shorter time. I am 75 years old and 45 seconds is blinding speed! 73 Karl -- Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI Linux User #450462 <a href="http://counter.li.org" target="_blank">http://counter.li.org</a>. Key ID = 3951B48D -- ubuntu-users mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users</a> </tt></pre> </div>