<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000099"> Johann Spies wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:20090406112415.GB12664@sun.ac.za" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 02:00:37PM -0400, Brian McKee wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Amedee Van Gasse (ubuntu) <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be"><amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I played with HTML years ago and now find the need to again is there a good html editor for linux </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">There is the perpetual war between vi and emacs. ;-) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">There's no war anymore. Emacs lost badly. Just some fanatics won't admit it :-) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">Why a war? Why loose or win? I use both - for different purposes. When programming, I use emacs and when editing configuration files or work with very large files, I prefer vim. Regards Johann </pre> </blockquote> I use nano for everything. A friend of mine recommends Bluefish for HTML: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/">http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/</a> </body> </html>