<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Chris G <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cl@isbd.net">cl@isbd.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Knapp wrote:<br>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:28 PM, John K Masters <[1]<a href="mailto:johnmasters@me.com">johnmasters@me.com</a>><br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 16:12 Sat 16 Aug , Derek Broughton wrote:<br>
> > Hal Burgiss wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 08:21:27PM -0400, David McNally wrote:<br>
> > >><br>
> > >> I'm looking for an email client that does everything that Microsoft<br>
> > >> Outlook does, and just as well (or better)<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Best email client? That might be a job for mutt, which, as they say,<br>
> > > sucks, but sucks less.<br>
> ><br>
> > LOL. But I think it fails on the primary requirement - doing<br>
> everything MS<br>
> > Outlook does.<br>
><br>
> Not true. It should be possible to write a macro for mutt that saves all<br>
> messages to a single file in a format totally unreadable by any other<br>
> mail app. Combine that with a carte blanche invitation to open any virus<br>
> contaminated mail and disallow any user configuration beyond the basics<br>
> and you have 99% of Outlook functionality.<br>
> --<br>
> John, on Mutt via my Mac<br>
><br>
> Ya, but what about the TV ads and cool art and everyone else uses it<br>
> factors?<br>
><br>
</div>Everyone who *is* anyone uses mutt don't they? :-)<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Chris Green<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
--<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Mutt is great, especially for reading / sending emails from remote servers without X :)<br><br>But, a good alternative to MS Outlook could either be Evolution, or Thunderbird with the calendar plugins. <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br><br>Kind Regards<br>Rudi Ahlers<br>
</div>