<div>On 5/1/07, Nicolai Spohrer <<a href="mailto:nicolai_spohrer@gmx.de">nicolai_spohrer@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > Just out of interested: how much can one expect whole disc encryption to > affect performance? I did not notice any perfomance regressions! It works just as fast as a usual Feisty. No problems with Kernel updates or so, but you have to rethink a bit when you resize an encrypted partition :o] If you already have an encrypted Feisty and install another (unencrypted) on the same PC, you have to remove the entries for the encrypted partitions - the new Feisty wants to mount it as ext3... But that's not a big problem. greetings</blockquote><div> Just wanted to say thanks. I've got another box I'm spinning up for play. I'll be doing this! JT </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">-- ubuntu-users mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com"> ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users</a> </blockquote></div>