<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
no but i know a troll when i see one ...be of good cheer and pay
Microsoft your money and be on your way little man and learn nothing
but how to keep gates and ballmer well fed ...good night and good luck
...lets end this thread <br>
<br>
Michael Satterwhite wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid45611707.90400@weblore.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Adriano Varoli Piazza wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 11/19/06, Michael Satterwhite <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:michael@weblore.com"><michael@weblore.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Renaud (Ron) Olgiati wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sunday 19 November 2006 11:16, my mailbox was graced by a missive
from Michael Satterwhite <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:michael@weblore.com"><michael@weblore.com></a> who wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But that says it all. I use my system for productive work. I *DO* expect
it to boot on the first try using my LCD monitor ... it can't.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Maybe we should keep to LTS releases for machines used in productive work ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Then you are acknowledging that the majority of Linux boxes are not used
for productive work and that the majority of Ubuntu releases are not of
sufficient quality to be considered for productive work (the majority of
releases aren't LTS)? That *IS* the logical conclusion to be drawn from
that statement.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Ubuntu is acknowledging that, no need for one of us to come and
confirm it. Devs and Ubuntu leaders did say to stay with Dapper if you
wanted stable.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Hmmm... I just looked at the website again. I must be going blind. I see
where they explain how to choose a version to download and install. Now
where on that page do they say Edgy is unstable? For that matter, where
on the website in general do they say Edgy is unstable? It is useless to
point at a 6 month old message about a Beta version and say people have
been warned. What type of idiot would be expecting new people coming to
Ubuntu to look beyond the instructions on the Website .... and THOSE
INSTRUCTIONS SAY THAT EDGY IS READY WITHOUT EQUIVOCATION!!!
What the "leaders" said 6 months ago - or on a mailing list is of no
more than academic interest. What are they saying right now on the
Ubuntu website? There isn't even a hint of that warning.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>