<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.10.2">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Is it necessary to enter in to a Gnomebaker vs Bonfire vs K3b vs Graveman debate? Please I'm just asking the suggested methodology for verifying written data. As I see it one must use the seperate md5sums program. Does anyone know of a GUI for this?<BR>
<BR>
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 20:57 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> I just had a look at gnomebaker. And you seem to be right concerning the</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> features. They seem to be the same (gnomebaker and bonfire). For me</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Bonfire is cuter but that's a personal opinion.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> What I can't figure out is "why do you think k3b is better that those</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> two ?" .</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Just try to make two copies of the same source CD using GnomeBaker or Bonfire. </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Maybe you'll find a way to get that done without doing the whole copying </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">twice. I definitely didn't. In k3b, the select box where you choose the </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">number of copies to be done, is right there where it belongs, in the copy </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">dialog.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Copying did take an estimated two or three times longer with the Gnome tools </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">than it did with k3b. I don't know why and I don't know how to change this.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Some other minor annoyances also existed in the Gnome tools, IMO. I don't </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">remember exactly what these were, since I dropped them almost immediately for </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">being in no way a match for k3b.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> I prefer not to install it on my Ubuntu because I don't want to have all</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> of the kde dependencies that come along.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">And these dependencies are a problem ... why?</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I use Gnome as my desktop environment. But I nevertheless use some kde </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">applications like k3b or KMail since there are no alternatives in the Gnome </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">world I know of. This works quite well and I don't have the slightest </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">impression that the kde dependencies hurt in any way.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">But the good thing is: whatever *you* do, it's *your* choice. And maybe </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">GnomeBaker or Bonfire are the perfect tools for your requierements, so it </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">wouldn't be necessary for you to "mess" with the kde dependencies.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Regards</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> mks</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>