<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Tony Arnold wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1151965576.5735.8.camel@localhost.localdomain" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 13:42 -0800, Noah wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:36:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Any particular reason why you don't want ipv6 active? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> security issues with it </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Can you elaborate, or point me somewhere with more information? </pre> </blockquote> Hi, sure. it is a protocol still under development so that should raise some hairs from a security standpoint right there. You could go to the NANOG mail list archives. Its been discussed there till infinitum. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nanog.org/">http://www.nanog.org/</a> but gosh google is good too. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.securitydocs.com/library/2757">http://www.securitydocs.com/library/2757</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.securitydocs.com/library/2757">http://www.securitydocs.com/library/2757</a> or check out cisco's site too. Cheers, Noah <blockquote cite="mid1151965576.5735.8.camel@localhost.localdomain" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Regards, Tony. </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>