<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.10.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:04 -0400, Rich Renomeron wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Brendon wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> i have found that evolution is much quicker than thunderbird, have used</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> them both in breezy, and evo in dapper, i find evo much better.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> and alot more better at doing multi pop accounts.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Oddly enough, I have found the exact opposite (though I have not tried</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">dapper yet, other than the Live CD). I mostly use IMAP accounts,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">though, so YMMV. I'm also using the MoFo 1.5.0.2 build rather than</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">what's in the Ubuntu package.</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Interesting, isn't it Firebird is fine for me, but Thunderbirds speed differential is very noticeable.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">With every new GNOME release, I give Evo a shot, and I always go back. </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">While its feature set is very compelling, there are just too many</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">annoying bugs for me that never seem to get fixed (and in some ca</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Fair enough. Most of these don't affect me. Although the HTML rendering of Evo is an issue for me as well, but I do like responsiveness.<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">ses</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">even looked at), such as:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> * Abysmally poor spam filter performance.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> * An extra click and dialog box to see spelling suggestions</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> (<A HREF="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228594">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228594</A>).</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> * The inability to control the composer's (display) font</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> independently of GTK menu/widget fonts</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> (<A HREF="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270025">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270025</A>).</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> * Severely crippled HTML rendering and composing</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> (<A HREF="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269995">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269995</A>,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> <A HREF="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247564">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247564</A>).</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">With the exception of the spam filter (I heard they switched to</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">bogofilter, which is a lot faster), none of these seem to be fixed in</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Dapper. I guess I'll try again with 2.8/Eft</FONT>.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
Kind Regards Russell<BR>
==================<BR>
www.windsorcycles.com.au<BR>
sales@windsorcycles.com.au<BR>
ph. 02 4577 3209<BR>
bikes.no-ip.info<BR>
Linux user #369094<BR>
================== <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>