<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Thanks for the info. Matt Tony Arnold wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1128623672.12330.7.camel@localhost.localdomain" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Matt, On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 12:34 -0400, Matt Patterson wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Another question: If using a shared library requires it to be loaded into ram, and that means huge ram usage as I am seeing because the modules are large, would it not be more memory efficient (I know it wastes hard disk space) to simply statically link apps instead of dynamically. Then apps wouldnt have dependency issues and they would only load the necessary routines into memory? Of course there would be redundancy in memory because each app could load the same functions, but still. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> There is clearly a trade off here and with a small number of applications where each only uses a small number of routines from libraries, you may get some gain, however, the shared library is probably best in the long run. You have to remember that it does not cost a great deal of resource to have a large shared library in virtual address space. With the paging algorithms in Linux only the pages of the library that get referenced, ie., actually run or have data will ever get loaded into real memory. And if the same page(s) of a shared library are used by more than one application, it is only loaded once! The other advantage of shared libs is that you do not have to re-link all the applications that use it if it gets updated (mostly!), whereas with statically linked apps you would. You could then end up with apps linked against different versions of the library and then get inconsistencies. In fact Ian Murdoch's (the founder of Debian) idea to separate out libraries from applications at the package level is partly what makes the update process of Debian derived Linux systems so straight forward. Regards, Tony. </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>