<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> It works just fine (although buggy) and it is the only way (at least for me) that I can take advantage of the usb 2.0 features of my equipment. I would love someone to tell me different so I could stop sing it because of its problems, but for hte time being I shall cope and enjoy usb 2.0 speeds. Matt Magnus Therning wrote: <blockquote cite="mid20050908175740.GA14564@die.therning.org" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:07:21PM -0400, Matt Patterson wrote: [..] </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I just thought I should point out that uhci_hcd and ehci_hcd do not have the same purpose. uhci_hcd is for usb 1.1 devices (low and full speed). ehci_hcd is for usb 2.0 devices (hi speed devices). I will admit that the ehci_hcd has a LOT of bugs in it and its compatibility is less than stellar, so going back to the uhci_hcd will make things work better, just slower!! </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Does it work at all? Using ehci_hcd results in the USB device being discovered over and over, reporting it all in /var/log/messages. /M </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>