<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7036.0"> <TITLE>Mono Packages and Ubuntu</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>  I imagine that this close to release it's fairly unlikely we'll see Mono 1.1.5 appear Hoary. I would love to see this happen, but I won't hold my breath either. I'm just curious what the goals are for Mono moving forward. I only ask because of tireless searching for some deb's for 1.1.5 eventually led me to the Debian Wiki where I read these three postings in order: <A HREF="http://wiki.debian.net/?Mono">http://wiki.debian.net/?Mono</A> (ZacBowling) <A HREF="http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoConventions">http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoConventions</A> (MartinvonLoewis) <A HREF="http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan">http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan</A> (meeby) So, at least in Debian's sarge, which if I understand it properly Ubuntu branched from, proper Mono support is going to have to change dramatically enough that they've opted to hold off until they can execute a new plan… the steps of which are listed in that last link. Is it safe to assume that Ubuntu will have / has these same issues with moving to newer Mono packages? Thanks, Matt </BODY> </HTML>