<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I'm a recent Gnome convert (windows and mandrake). The nuvola theme on
Ubuntu's "clean" install is a great UI IMHO.<br>
<br>
The only issue I see long term with Gnome vs KDE is market penetration.
To date, the numbers I've seen show KDE being deployed at a ratio of at
least 2:1 compared to Gnome - I'd be happy to be corrected on this.<br>
<br>
History doesn't seem to care which is the better technology but which
gets critical mass first. If we think back to the last 30 years, a lot
of second best technologies seem to win out. I'm not saying KDE is
second best, but the point I'm making is even if Gnome is technically
superior, that tends to be irrelevant, it's who gets that mass first. <br>
<br>
Some examples:<br>
Beta vs VHS<br>
Z80 vs 8080<br>
68000 vs 80186, 80286, 80386<br>
CPM/80 vs MS-DOS (early versions)<br>
Alpha vs Pentium/Xeon<br>
PowerPC vs Pentium/Xeon<br>
OS/2 vs MS Windows<br>
Mac vs PC <br>
MacOS vs MS Windows<br>
<br>
How well have all the products on the left done? Primarily niche
markets to date.<br>
<br>
Let's try to get Ubuntu (or at least Debian based distro's - stable
with simple to use package mgt) a critical mass of market share. i.e.
in the right hand column :-) If we need KDE & Gnome to do that so
be it. Let's target them as options in Ubuntu and highlight they have
different primary aims or objectives. <br>
<br>
For example:<br>
Gnome a full featured stable, clean and functional desktop for
corporate and home office use.<br>
KDE a full featured desktop with many utils pre-installed lots of
eye candy, suitable for gaming and multimedia.<br>
<br>
The above are just examples before I step on anyone's toes :-)<br>
<br>
Std disclaimer, this is just my 2c worth on the issue.<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Kind Regards Russ
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.windsorcycles.com.au">http://www.windsorcycles.com.au</a>
</pre>
<br>
<br>
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20050109033023.GA8709@alcor.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:58:10PM -0500, Quest-Master wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">IMO, if the Ubuntu users want KDE, just use another distro or install
it from Universe. I'm sure an outrage would erupt if development time
was split between Gnome and KDE.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
>From what I have seen so far, there are enough people willing to work on KDE
in Ubuntu that it wouldn't detract significantly from the work being done on
GNOME.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>