<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.2.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
I<FONT COLOR="#000000"> got a headache trying to get the GUI to</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#000000">work - and didn't succeed.</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
? That's bad. Once downloaded with Synpatic, I only had to start the back-end by typing 'mlnet' in a terminal, then starting the GUI by typing 'mlgui' in another terminal and it worked fine...<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I have twelve downloads going on and I'm connected to Donkey and G2</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">(Gnutella2?). Should these be called networks or servers? It says on my</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">screen that I'm "Connected to 4 servers on the Donkey network" and</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">"Connected to 4 servers on the G2 network". As you can see I'm new to</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">this file sharing thing.</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I am fairly new to P2P too, only used very occasionally.<BR>
<BR>
Edonkey and Gnutella are 'networks', each of them containing containing thouands of 'servers'. A 'server' being any personal computer connected to said network, who made his local file public. So, as soon as you start MLDonkey, you become a 'server'. <BR>
That's my very limited understand of the system...probably all BS ;o)<BR>
And I don't understand why there are several networks. Since they all do the same thing, would be much easier to have one network, rather having things like MLDonkey that have to manage 7 different networks...<BR>
<BR>
Vince
</BODY>
</HTML>