Where to report a bug?
Robert Heller
heller at deepsoft.com
Mon Apr 10 14:25:43 UTC 2023
At Mon, 10 Apr 2023 09:43:19 -0400 (EDT) "Ubuntu user technical support,? not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 10 Apr 2023 08:38:22 -0400 (EDT) "Ubuntu user technical support,? not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > At Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:59:12 -0500 "Ubuntu user technical support,? not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You wouldn't need to build both packages from source, just one. You
> > > could install the regular bison package from the main repo and then
> > > install bison++ to /usr/local. The bison executable from bison++ would
> > > be installed to /usr/local/bin and wouldn't conflict with the one from
> > > the bison package which would be in /usr/bin, You'd still want to rename
> > > or remove /usr/local/bin/bison because it would be found first in $PATH,
> > > but it wouldn't conflict upon installation.
> > >
> >
> > I actually don't even need to do that. All I need to do is fix the file(s) in
> > the debian directory in the bison++ package to correct its error. Then I can
> > install the resulting bison++ deb file normally, putting bison++ in /usr/bin
> > and bison++.1 in /usr/share/man/man1/.
> >
>
> Done:
>
> *Corrected* file in (bison++_1.21.11-5.debian.tar.gz):
>
> http://files.deepsoft.com/Other/bison++Ubuntu/
Just uploaded to the above location: fresh builds of conflict free bison++ for
Ubuntu 18.04 (i386 and amd64) and Debian 10 (armhf [Raspbian] and arm64).
>
--
Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services
heller at deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list