Solved: Install not using whole disk

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 14:55:32 UTC 2022


On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 19:25, David <david at daku.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks to the several who answered my question.  The machine in
> question is used as a server, and avoiding the Logical Volume seems
> the wisest choice.  Then the question becomes which of the offered
> file-systems to use, ext4, xfs, brtfs, but that's a different question.

Your quoting is broken.

Please use plain text only -- see https://useplaintext.email/ for
reference -- and bottom-post: your reply should go _below_ the trimmed
text to which you're replying.

This is normal for most mailing lists and is the traditional Internet
way of doing things.

Re LVM: well, one of the issues with Linux LVM is that you need a
filesystem _as well_ on top of LVM.

So:

* what is the role of the box?
* what kind of disks will you have and how many?
* how do you plan to arrange them?
* will it be on a PSU?
* will you be regularly backing up? how? to what?

If it's an ordinary PC, with one big disk (say), not on a PC, just
plain old ext4. If an array, these days, on Ubuntu, I'd use ZFS ZRAID.

But if it's a NAS server, well, I recently moved to TrueNAS Core and I
like it so far.

If you want a general-purpose Linux box, Zentyal might help you.

But you've not given us enough to go on.


-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list