Solved: Install not using whole disk
Liam Proven
lproven at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 14:55:32 UTC 2022
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 19:25, David <david at daku.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks to the several who answered my question. The machine in
> question is used as a server, and avoiding the Logical Volume seems
> the wisest choice. Then the question becomes which of the offered
> file-systems to use, ext4, xfs, brtfs, but that's a different question.
Your quoting is broken.
Please use plain text only -- see https://useplaintext.email/ for
reference -- and bottom-post: your reply should go _below_ the trimmed
text to which you're replying.
This is normal for most mailing lists and is the traditional Internet
way of doing things.
Re LVM: well, one of the issues with Linux LVM is that you need a
filesystem _as well_ on top of LVM.
So:
* what is the role of the box?
* what kind of disks will you have and how many?
* how do you plan to arrange them?
* will it be on a PSU?
* will you be regularly backing up? how? to what?
If it's an ordinary PC, with one big disk (say), not on a PC, just
plain old ext4. If an array, these days, on Ubuntu, I'd use ZFS ZRAID.
But if it's a NAS server, well, I recently moved to TrueNAS Core and I
like it so far.
If you want a general-purpose Linux box, Zentyal might help you.
But you've not given us enough to go on.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list