Slightly OT? WiFi problems

[Colin Law]

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 11:05, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
> ..
> 3 is a minimal mesh but with almost no redundant paths and will not
> give much better results than one. It's a flip-flop: there are 2
> possible paths for the signal.

To be pedantic (always a good thing where computers are involved) I
think there are five paths.  If the router connected to the WAN is A
and the others are B and C, and the client is X then the routes are
X -> A -> WAN
X -> B -> A -> WAN
X -> C -> A -> WAN
X -> B -> C -> A -> WAN
X -> C -> B -> A -> WAN

None of which contradicts your main point that you need a good number
to make an effective mesh.

Colin