snapd

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:59:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 12:01:50 +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
>>Is it OK to remove snapd altogether? Would I lose any important
>>functionality?  
>
>Assuming you are using snappy, then perhaps disabling or enabling
>socket activation for snappy daemon on demand does solve the issue.

The systemd terms pitfall rear its ugly head again. You could 'stop'
and 'start' it on demand, this is what I wanted to point out,
'enabling'/'disabling' is related to the startup, here you probably
want to 'disable' it.