Search for utility to identify source of WWW traffic

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 14:05:49 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>On 01/04/2018, Ralf Mardorf <silver.bullet at zoho.com> wrote:
>> Liam's guess:
>> "he will not supply the people trying to
>> help him with direct, honest, open answers." -
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2018-March/293756.html
>So, the purpose of this list, is now flaming?
>
>Sad.

It is not flaming, you ask for help, but you don't provide the
information we need to help you. You assume that you have found out
some correct information, while you are missing a lot of basic Linux
knowledge. You don't share this information with us, while asking for
help again. You get similar allegedly misbehaviour what ever browser
you are using. First you at least informed us, that the culprit was
Firefox, a release of Firefox you called "sabotaged" by the developers
and a while back you claimed that Firefox was not compromised by
upstream, but the official Ubuntu repository provided a compromised
version. There is no evidence for your claims. It's happening for
nobody else on this list. We tried to help you, to narrow down the
problem, but you ignore most hints, you are only interested in misusing
a few hints, to confirm your wrong assumptions, but even this fails,
since you cannot confirm wrong assumptions. I provided links to 2
threads out of several more with similar trends. Everybody could read
those two threads and could search the mailing list archive for more
threads. You can not claim that I'm writing untruth. You are wasting
the time of people trying to help you, and your incomplete information
leads to the miscalculation of a "highjacked computer", so the résumé
is that your claims spread fear, doubt, and uncertainty, since Ubuntu
packages or Firefox upstream and now some browser you don't name should
be shady.