LCD monitor
R Kimber
richardkimber at politicsresources.net
Fri Jul 28 15:15:15 UTC 2017
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:39:35 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:12:09 +0200, Liam Proven wrote:
> >You are even more frugal than me, Ralf. I would never buy a cut-down
> >CPU such as a Celeron, for instance.
>
> Originally I bought it in an emergency situation, when I don't had the
> money for a Pentium or i3. IOW I don't had a choice. Now I have
> got a choice. Yesterday I checked, if it would make sense to replace the
> Celeron. However, a Pentium known to perform 25% faster, assumed the
> RAM would be 1600, while mine are just 1333, does coast 3 times as much
> and a cheap i3 might not perform better than such a Pentium. Assumed I
> should notice issues when making music during the summer holidays, I
> might replace the Celeron, but perhaps it does a good job. At the
> moment I'm not willing to pay that much money, for less, if any
> improvement at all. For emails and a browser I don't need more, even
> tar.gz backups are fast. Compiling a kernel still is weak and still
> takes around 80 minutes in 3.9 GiB tmpfs.
>
Is all this really related to Ubuntu?
--
Richard Kimber
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list