Why do all the sudo? [was Re: Software updater no longer functional]
Robert Heller
heller at deepsoft.com
Sun Jan 22 19:20:49 UTC 2017
At Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:01:37 +0000 "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On 22 January 2017 at 17:21, Ken D'Ambrosio <ken at jots.org> wrote:
> > On 2017-01-22 12:12, Robert Heller wrote:
> >
> >>> Yep! Couldn't agree more. I use 'sudo -i' a lot! But it's rarely
> >>> suggested in any advice or documentation I've seen.
> >>
> >>
> >> This is intentional.
> >
> >
> > It is. But...
>
> A significant point is that many people here asking for help, or
> finding it when googling later, are not experienced admins. An
> experienced admin seeing instructions here which use sudo will know
> immediately the alternative techniques and is entirely free to use
> them if he/she sees fit. For the less experienced users it is safer
> to use sudo.
+100. Yes, there are all sorts of "shortcuts", but unless you really know
what you are doing, the shortcuts can burn you. Repeating sudo may seem like
a stupid waste, but it is the best way to *document* what is going on and is a
good practice for less experienced users. There are various benefits,
including an audit trail, the command get stored in the *user's* history (for
*easy* later recall).
There is also nothing stopping you from collecting a complex command sequence
in a bash shell script and then:
sudo ./bunchofcomplexcommands.sh
(but be carefull to debug that script first!)
>
> Colin
>
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services
heller at deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list