Clonezilla question
Rolf Grunsky
rgrunsky at sympatico.ca
Sun Dec 10 15:41:21 UTC 2017
On 2017-12-10 06:33 AM, Xen wrote:
> Phil schreef op 10-12-2017 9:51:
>> On 10/12/17 16:58, Xen wrote:
>>> Phil schreef op 09-12-2017 23:56:
>>>
>>>> So, how can I clone my laptop's SSD without a second computer?
>>>
>>> You can do so from a live run of any Ubuntu DVD.
>>
>> That sounds like an interesting idea; I'll give it some thought.
>>
>> I don't need a backup, just some way of cloning what I have onto
>> another SSD. Windows is the main problem because I don't have an
>> installation disk.
>
> I'm not 100% certain CloneZilla works flawlessly with Windows.
>
> By all means, ensure that when you clone Windows, Windows has shut down
> completely first.
>
> Do not backup a "quickboot" 'opened' Windows partition and do not try to
> use ntfsfix to do it regardless. That is all I can say.
>
> I should really contact the CloneZilla people about this but I have
> restored a Windows system and subsequently it failed to persistently (or
> consistently) boot.
>
> Maybe ntfsfix does work, but I can't remember.
>
> So if you do, please ensure you can boot Windows after the "clone" and
> also ensure you can boot it at least 20 times ;-).
>
> Also,
>
> if you clone any LVM physical volumes using Ubuntu 16.04 directly onto
> another disk in the same system (without using an image, and hence with
> both disks connected at the same time) be *very* careful not to activate
> any volume groups, and/or not to run any LVM command while both disks
> are connected (after the clone).
>
> 16.10 fixes this, but in 16.04 it is ... tragic.
>
> Windows also may not "like" having 2 disks connected that have the same
> partitions. Always remember to disconnect the clone before rebooting, or
> shutdown ASAP (hard) when you accidentally do boot.
>
> Cloning disks is risky stuff if you do it directly.
>
> It is not necessary to use CloneZilla; it just speeds things up.
>
> You can also just "dd" the entire disk, but the same precautions apply.
>
> Personally given my bad experience with CloneZilla I would DD my Windows
> partitions and spend the extra time.
>
> CloneZilla is just an assortment of scripts with a bad GUI that in the
> end use "partclone".
>
> Partclone is probably rock-solid but I just don't know what CloneZilla
> might or might not do wrong.
>
> Maybe other people have a different experience but I lost my Windows
> system this way.
>
> There is no benefit to using CloneZilla (or partclone) if it was not for
> the time-savings.
>
> I mean it just speeds up the process immensely.
>
> This is all I can say: be warned :p.
>
Clonezilla works with Windows. Or at least is does with Windows 7.
I have a Dell Optiplex 790 that came with Windows 7 installed on a 250Gb
drive. I created an image with Clonezilla and then restored the image to
a new 2Tb drive. I then expanded the image to fill the new drive with
gpartd. Worked perfectly!
The image is about 11Gb which I can backup on a BluRay disc. This is a
backup that I can always use to restore the drive to its original state.
--
TRUTH in her dress finds facts too tight.
In fiction she moves with ease.
Stray Birds by Rabindranath Tagore
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list